
Harley Lovegrove is an interim manager, specializing in managing both small and large multi-national companies through periods of change. He is the Chairman and one of the founding partners of the Brussels based group practice, The Bayard Partnership. Harley is also a lecturer and motivational speaker and author of two books: 'Making a Difference' and 'Inspirational Leadership' which are also published in Dutch, under the titles: 'Maak het Verschil' , and 'Inspireer en Leid'.
He formed his first company in 1978 at the age of 21 and has since taken up numerous interim management posts, working for a variety of businesses from high technology and software to petrochemical, transport, mobile telecommunications, apparel and building construction.
Archive
- 2012
- 2011
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- 2010
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- 2009
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- 2008
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- 2007
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- Good Project Managers are hard to find!
- Interim Managers have never had it so good?
- Haircut - a joke about Interim Managers!
- The Importance of Prince2 or PMI certification for Interim Managers
- What is an Interim Manager?
- Welcome to The Interim Manager ' s Forum
- The Difference between consultants and interim managers
An Algorithm for everything
I was at a seminar last week where one of the presenters was covering the subject of diversity. She didn’t take the usual angle of reducing everything to a question of either gender or race but generally lifted the whole topic to a much higher and all inclusive level. Just when I was beginning to feel comfortable with her thought provoking approach she flashed up on the giant screen an extremely complex looking algorithm.
Just in case there might be a reader that does not exactly know what an algorithm is, then I can tell you that it is not the name of a famous American politician’s personal dance band but a mathematical equation that describes the instructions to perform a particular function (or something like that)!
The speaker was delivering her important message to an audience largely made up of male chemists and engineers and I think her point went down very well judging by the reaction. Diversity is not solely about a question of exclusion but also a lack of recognition that within any specific gender, race, age, or group of people, there is any number of diversities that we need to recognize.
It was then it got me wondering how much of what we think or do can be expressed in terms of algorithms? Can, for example, a complex business decision (that may include subjective issues) be seriously reduced to a single algorithm? Could deciding on a life partner be better made on the basis of an algorithm rather than sexual drive and instinct? And how long, I wonder, will it be before someone writes an auto-generating algorithm applet for the I-phone?
A few years back I was running the operations of a software company where the daily language was of algorithms and ‘low level programming’ and to be honest when you really get to grips with what is going on, it’s not that complex. I don’t mean that writing complex algorithms is easy, far from it, but when they are explained by an eloquent software engineer or mathematician they seem very much more accessible.
It never ceases to amaze me how many of us feel comforted by a scientific explanation. Somehow science makes things true. And yet too often it is seemingly well grounded explanations, given to us from people that sound like they know better, that lead us in completely the wrong direction.
At the end of the day I believe that it is not so much what is said that matters in life but what happens as a result of it. And so this week I hope that a whole bunch of people will be starting to explore what diversity means to them and how they will be living it at home and in their working environments, rather than debating if the algorithm could ever be correct or is flawed.
Have a nice week
Harley
Newsletter
Recent comments
- Anonymous on Cut the blah blah– give me the real reason!
- Christian on Great innovators don’t complain
- Koen on Great innovators don’t complain
- Jan on “And we’re off!”
- Richard L. on “And we’re off!”
- Laurie on “And we’re off!”
- Anonymous on “And we’re off!”
- Reality Check on Age Descrimination
- Bertrand on Age Descrimination
- Anonymous on Age Descrimination
- EC Firenze on Dress code for interim & project managers
- stress tips on Dress code for interim & project managers
- harley on Not the best way to start an evening!
- Laurie on Not the best way to start an evening!
- Camden Markets on Work-life balance! by Kurt De Ruwe
Comments
Nice!
That Guy was so clever!
Hello Harley,
I'm not a frequent blog poster, but this time you remembered me of a famous statement by Albert Einstein, which I believe deserves to be mentionned here:
Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts
kind regards
Koen
Hi Harley,
A fascinating subject that is met head on with chaos. Identical twins with identical DNA have personalities driven more by their life experiences than the algorithm that made them. When chaos enters the code or algorithm it tends to fall apart. Hence an algorithm to predict something as simple as the weather at any give moment and place in time is never going to happen. For even simpler less chaotic systems like a 90 minute game of football an algorithm to predict the outcome is still never going to happen. As for a 60 year marriage, I'd leave the science well alone and go with gut instinct. Ones intuition is rarely wrong, the same can't be said for algorithms.
Kind regards, Damien (little brother)
Hi Harvey,
Current thinking is that everything in the universe can be expressed as an algorithm, including DNA and the way biology functions. Information, content and function can explain pretty much anything.
Hence the algorithms success: it is the most appropriate way to explain and represent what's going on - at pretty much any level.
That's the comfort it can give - which of course does not invalidate your last paragraph at all - quite the contrary.
Kind regards
Post new comment