The dawning of the age of the epigenome and collaborative thinking

Today we in the west are so privileged and relatively wealthy that we can more or less do whatever we want to do. At no other point in history have so many been so free to explore and appreciate our planet. And while the ecological impact of this might be frightening, I am somewhat pacified by the fact that everything that is thinkable is now becoming possible in ever decreasing periods of time. I mainly put this down to the current trend for imaginative partnerships and collaborative thinking.     

Since the early 1950’s corporations have invested in research based around an almost paranoiac sense of secrecy to protect their intellectual property. So much so, that even within their own research structures, knowledge between their own scientists was very rarely shared. A ‘successful’ scientific career was often measured by the number of white papers and patents an individual scientist published, rather than their possible application. The result of all this has been a much slower rate of change than could have been possible.

Last week I heard of a major breakthrough in the field of epigenomes. These are the amazing nano switches that turn human genomes on and off.  It appears that their discovery could do more for the improvement of human health than the simple water closet did for people living in cities in the late 19th century.

Recent activities in Switzerland have also demonstrated the real benefits of collaborative research.The fact that when the CERN scientists got stuck with their unexplainable findings that Neutrinos seem to be travelling faster than the speed of light, they immediately reached out to the global scientific community for advice and feedback. Sharing whatever data was necessary.

Astronomers too are using the hundreds of thousands of amateurs around the world to help analyze data that would otherwise take a small group of university research scientist’s decades to wade through. The self centered, ego centric scientific research patterns of the past are now giving way to much healthier collaborative processes.

However, we humans are still far too slow to adapt on a local scale. Useful new technologies seem to take much longer to become the norm than one would imagine or expect. Too many of us still trying to fix our existing problems with the same old silo thinking that has proved largely in-effective for the last thirty years.  

At long last, the use of web-based collaborative tools is really beginning to bring about a significant change in human behavior when it comes to knowledge sharing and transfer, the likes of which have never before been possible.

Have a good week,

Harley

Comments

Although I fully support the idea of collaborative thinking and sharing of ideas I ask myself the question of whom will be the benefactor. In the commercial world outside of the academic institutions patents rule and in their current form are practically out of reach for the starting entrepreneur. Hence plentiful good ideas and concepts either remain at the source waiting for a "good opportunity" to surface or remain hidden away in the archives of the patent office. What if we could arrive at a global rewarding system for constructive participation in the realisation of any solution that contributes to improve live on earth (or beyond actually)

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.

Content subject to copyright, Harley Lovegrove 2011